Total Pageviews
Friday, 22 May 2015
Pit-bulls. a definite hazard to you May 17 at 6:30pm · - "My question to pit-bull fans is: If pit bulls are such wonderful family dogs
- "My question to pit-bull fans is: If pit bulls are such wonderful family dogs, why have they been banned in 12 countries? That's right, 12. Belgium; Brazil; Denmark; Finland; France; Canada (Winnipeg, Quebec); the Netherlands; New Zealand; Norway; Poland; Puerto Rico (a commonwealth of the United States); and Sweden. The pit bull is rightfully banned from these smart countries because it is a very aggressive, fearless, vicious, bloodthirsty attack dog that has no place in civilized society."
Sharon Smith added 2 new photos. May 20 at 10:25pm · Ha ha ha, Watch Mickey is hilarious. The first screen shot is their attempt to make everybody believe that Mickey's moving out is because they want to give him a better place to live. After all when his morning breakfast 'friend' is the pooh he left earlier and they are joined by the pee he did before that.
Sharon Smith added 2 new photos.
Ha ha ha, Watch Mickey is hilarious. The first screen shot is their attempt to make everybody believe that Mickey's moving out is because they want to give him a better place to live. After all when his morning breakfast 'friend' is the pooh he left earlier and they are joined by the pee he did before that.
Annie pretty much sums it up in 4 lines.
What they are saying is Mickey did not get to be set free. He's gonna be in jail the rest of his life. But they won't come out and say it.
They played some cute music that I think was directed at this page and If You Watch Mickey. Or its rubbing dog attack victims nose in the fact that he won't be put to death. Just heartless people but we knew that from how they treated Mickey..
So here's my suggestions for some songs to make a play list in:
And lastly here is a nice list already made up for him:
You're welcome, that is all, next!
Wednesday, 20 May 2015
Hate speech
Further information: Hate speech
Counterterrorism expert Ehud Sprinzak argues that verbal violence is "the use of extreme language against an individual or a group that either implies a direct threat that physical force will be used against them, or is seen as an indirect call for others to use it." Sprinzak argues that verbal violence is often a substitute for real violence, and that the verbalization of hate has the potential to incite people who are incapable of distinguishing between real and verbal violence to engage in actual violence.[18]
People tend to judge the offensiveness of hate speech on a gradient depending on how public the speech is and what group it targets.[19] Although people's opinions of hate speech are complex, they typically consider public speech targeting ethnic minorities to be the most offensive.
Historian Daniel Goldhagen, discussing antisemitic hate groups, argues that we should view verbal violence as "an assault in its own right, having been intended to produce profound damage—emotional, psychological, and social—to the dignity and honor of the Jews. The wounds that people suffer by ... such vituperation ... can be as bad as ... [a] beating."[20]
In the mid-1990s, the popularity of the Internet brought new international exposure to many organizations, including groups with beliefs such as white supremacy, neo-Nazism,homophobia, Holocaust denial and Islamophobia. Several white supremacist groups have founded websites dedicated to attacking their perceived enemies. In 1996, the Simon Wiesenthal Center of Los Angeles asked Internet access providers to adopt a code of ethics that would prevent extremists from publishing their ideas online. In 1996, theEuropean Commission formed the Consultative Commission on Racism and Xenophobia (CRAX), a pan-European group which was tasked to "investigate and, using legal means, stamp out the current wave of racism on the Internet."[21]
Violence and hate crimes
Further information: Hate crime
Four categories associated with hate groups' propensity for violence are: organizational capacity, organizational constituency, strategic connectivity, and structural arrangement.[9] The larger an extremist group is and the longer it has existed, the more prone the group is to engage in violence. Regionally, hate groups based in the West and Northeast are more likely to engage in violence than those based in the South. If a group has a charismatic leader, it is more likely to be violent. Groups that share a conflict-based relationship with another group are more likely to engage in extreme violence. The amount of ideological literature a group publishes is linked to significant decreases in a group's violent behavior, with more literature linked to lower levels of violence.
Violent hate groups tend to commit "downward crimes," which involve the persecution of a minority group by a more powerful majority.[10] By contrast, acts of terrorism are typically "upward crimes," with a low-power minority perpetrator targeting a more prominent majority group. There is no evidence suggesting that hate crimes precede terrorism; in fact, hate crimes tend to take place as retaliation following terrorist attacks, especially when the attack was on a core piece of American identity or ideology.
The California Association for Human Relations Organizations (CAHRO) asserts that hate groups such as the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) and White Aryan Resistance (WAR) preach violence against racial, religious, sexual and other minorities in the United States.[11] Joseph E. Agne argues that hate-motivated violence is a result of the successes of the civil rights movement, and he asserts that the KKK has resurfaced and that new hate groups have formed.[12] Agne argues that it is a mistake to underestimate the strength of the hate-violence movement, its apologists and its silent partners.[13]
In the US, crimes that "manifest evidence of prejudice based on race, religion, sexual orientation, or ethnicity, including the crimes of murder and nonnegligent manslaughter; forcible rape; robbery; aggravated assault; burglary; larceny-theft; motor vehicle theft; arson; simple assault; intimidation; and destruction, damage or vandalism of property", directed at the government, an individual, a business, or institution, involving hate groups and hate crimes, may be investigated as acts of domestic terrorism.[14][15][16][17]
A hate groupis an organized group or movement that advocates and practiceshatred,hostility, orviolencetowards members of arace, ethnicity,religion,gender, gender identity, sexual orientation or any other designated sector of society.
A hate groupis an organized group or movement that advocates and practiceshatred,hostility, orviolencetowards members of arace, ethnicity,religion,gender, gender identity, sexual orientation or any other designated sector of society. According to the United StatesFederal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), a hate group's "primary purpose is to promote animosity, hostility, and malice against persons belonging to a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity/national origin which differs from that of the members of the organization."[1] The Southern Poverty Law Center's (SPLC) definition of a "hate group" includes those having beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics.[2] Scholars find it difficult to define hate group and "whether a particular group is to be classified as a hate group is sometimes in the eye of the beholder."[3]
In the US, two organizations that monitor intolerance and hate groups are the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)[4] and the SPLC.[5] The ADL and the SPLC maintain a list of what they deem to be hate groups, supremacist groups and anti-Semitic, anti-government or extremist groups that have committed hate crimes. However, at least for the SPLC, inclusion of a group in the list "does not imply a group advocates or engages in violence or other criminal activity."[6] According to the SPLC, from 2000 to 2008, hate group activity saw a 50 percent increase in the US, with a total of 926 active groups.[7]
Hate groups are also tracked by the FBI.[citation needed] The FBI does not publish a list of hate groups, and "[I]nvestigations are conducted only when a threat or advocacy of force is made; when the group has the apparent ability to carry out the proclaimed act; and when the act would constitute a potential violation of federal law."[8]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



